Porting to XCB
otaylor at redhat.com
Tue Aug 9 19:06:07 EEST 2005
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 17:45 -0700, Travis Spencer wrote:
> Hey All,
> I've got a port to use XCB started. It is kinda ugly right now, but I
> wanted to ask if I should bother to continue. If so, should I
> autotool xsettings, so that it can build with and without XCB? If so,
> should XCB be the default backend or Xlib? I vote for XCB to be to
> default backend and let users disable it if they don't have XCB.
Porting *what* to XCB? I don't think porting the XSETTINGS sample code
to XCB makes sense, if that is what you are talking about.
It's meant to be sample code to be cut-and-and pasted into other
projects. Adding a XCB dependency will make that process much more
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/attachments/20050809/1aa0c14f/attachment.pgp
More information about the xdg