simple search api (was Re: mimetype standardisation by testsets)
Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
mikkel.kamstrup at gmail.com
Fri Nov 24 08:40:17 EET 2006
2006/11/23, Patryk Zawadzki <patrys at pld-linux.org>:
> Dnia 23-11-2006, czw o godzinie 20:44 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
> > 2006/11/23, Fabrice Colin <fabrice.colin at gmail.com>:
> > Well, AFAIK, dbus allows complex structures like arrays or
> > dictionaries.
> > Yeah, but that really only accounts as collections of simple data
> > types in my book. What I meant was just that you can't have Query
> > object, like fx Lucene does, and pass that over the wire. Not in a
> > desktop neutral way at least - or please correct me if I'm wrong! :-)
> But you can use object handlers just like you use file handlers - let
> the DBUS interface pass you a handle and use that handle when calling
> other interface methods.
Right, but do you think this is a good idea? I must admit I don't know how
this would effect performance - construction the query object via dbus
Also, I think such query object onstruction should be bound to the native
toolkit of your desktop, so that it is a GObject in Gnome fx (I know that
this is not ruled out in your suggestion).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the xdg