org.freedesktop.SessionManagement

[Richard Hughes]

On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 12:04 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> 
> What about system-level apps that need to inhibit (think daemons)?
> They have no session daemon to register to.

Agree, I'm just throwing some ideas into the air.

> System-level locking is still needed and it's more suited as it does
> not require you to register any foobar callbacks that just return
> FALSE, instead you just obtain a lock on a specific HAL device and
> free the lock when you're done. 

Sure, David Zeuthen has written a bit about this.

Richard.