david at fubar.dk
Tue Apr 3 09:06:18 PDT 2007
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 12:04 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> What about system-level apps that need to inhibit (think daemons)?
> They have no session daemon to register to.
> System-level locking is still needed and it's more suited as it does
> not require you to register any foobar callbacks that just return
> FALSE, instead you just obtain a lock on a specific HAL device and
> free the lock when you're done.
I written some guidelines about that here
that are not yet finalized. Discussion should happen on the HAL list.
More information about the xdg