Icon naming issue
patrys at pld-linux.org
Sat Apr 28 06:42:35 PDT 2007
On 4/28/07, Kenneth Wimer <kwwii at bootsplash.org> wrote:
> On Saturday 28 April 2007 08:03:27 Rodney Dawes wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 22:34 +0200, Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> > > On Friday 27 April 2007 21:39:48 James Richard Tyrer wrote:
> > > > Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> > > > HiColor is not "default", it is fallback.
> > >
> > > Semantics
> > Failing to follow the semantics of a specification means you fail to
> > follow the specification.
> Ok, someone show me where it says that hicolor should be a full-blown theme of
> its own.
A good thing is there is no such place. Even if there was I strongly
believe that no particular desktop should place a full-blown icon
theme in a shared path. A more acceptable approach would be to have a
fd.o neutral theme based on the icon-naming-spec. But as hicolor is a
last resort when searching for icons, even this doesn't seem
More information about the xdg