More on the menu spec test suite

[Jannis Pohlmann]

On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:23:51 -0500, dan sinclair wrote:

> Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> > I tried to run the submenu-collision test, which failed with the
> > following (slightly simplified) diff:
> > 
> > --- /tmp/menutestdir/run-result.filtered
> > +++ /tmp/menutestdir/required-result.sorted
> > +Applications/
> >    kate.desktop    /tmp/menutestdir/xdg_data_dir/applications/kate.desktop
> > +Applications/
> >    kbabel.desktop /tmp/menutestdir/xdg_data_dir/applications/kbabel.desktop
> > +Applications/
> >    KEdit.desktop   /tmp/menutestdir/xdg_data_dir/applications/KEdit.desktop
> > +Applications/
> >    kwrite.desktop  /tmp/menutestdir/xdg_data_dir/applications/kwrite.desktop
> > +Applications/
> >    quanta.desktop  /tmp/menutestdir/xdg_data_dir/applications/quanta.desktop
> > 
> > The test includes two menus which both have the name "Applications"
> > and contain an <Include> rule. The test expects no output from the
> > implementation. If I remember the specification correctly, a new
> > menu should be created with the two <Include>'s added, which would
> > look like this:
> > 
> 
> Looking at the results file in the test suite it's expecting the 
> desktop's you listed as the results. It looks more like your 
> implementation isn't returning any desktop files.

Crap, you're right. I must have lost my mind during the almost seven
hours spent with the test suite, hehe. Thanks.

  - Jannis