kevin.krammer at gmx.at
Thu Mar 22 03:31:43 PDT 2007
On Thursday 22 March 2007 06:55 +0100, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Kevin Krammer wrote:
> >> Yes, a dictionary might be nice, but it's not trivial to access in C.
> >> This stuff really needs to be *trivial* for an application to access,
> >> hence why I think booleans are probably best.
> >How likely is an application written in C not going to use the D-Bus
> > glib bindings?
> Any library designed to be used by other languages.
Hmm, I thought that the main idea in D-Bus is to always use bindings.
How would one deal with D-Bus APIs that already use dictionationaries? Just
ignore those methods in wrappers?
Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
KDE user support, developer mentoring
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/attachments/20070322/7871263d/attachment.pgp
More information about the xdg