hughsient at gmail.com
Thu Mar 29 14:46:55 PDT 2007
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 17:36 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> Well, as this spec is a) intended to be stable soon; b) have a
> of many many years; c) probably will be used by closed-source ISV's; I
> really think Standby() needs to go... Richard?
> ps. sorry for being an ass-tastic about this; I just think that, due
> to a)-c) above that we need to be extremely careful about the
> this isn't some pre-1.0 interface like the ones in HAL that may break
> in the future.
Ohh only >1.0 is stable. <1.0 is fair game to change, although I hope we
can be at 1.0 in a few weeks / months.
Ohh, and thanks for being asstastic. :-)
/me has just learnt a new word.
More information about the xdg