[XESAM] RDF vs .Desktop
Jos van den Oever
jvdoever at gmail.com
Wed May 16 15:22:47 PDT 2007
2007/5/16, Evgeny Egorochkin <phreedom.stdin at gmail.com>:
> The reason I'm for the second example is that some external tools will be able
> to extract more semantics from this definition as compared to the first one.
> Nevertheless the first one is a valid RDF.
The second looks better intuitively too. It's very similar to xml+rdf
but without the spacefilling tags. In addition, the format looks
rather simple to me. Parsing it will still involve parsing special
escaped characters though. But i dont think any format can avoid that.
Go Tutle: Achilles cannot catch you.
More information about the xdg