hadess at hadess.net
Thu Jul 17 07:27:59 PDT 2008
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 10:25 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 00:06 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > Its been a month since I sent out this proposal, and the only comment I
> > have heard so far is that the name "Content types" may be slightly
> > ambiguous. My proposal for addressing this is to change the section
> > title to "Content types for volumes", and stick with x-content for the
> > type, since it is already in use.
> > If there is no further feedback, I'd like to move ahead with adding this
> > to the spec, since we want to implement content type sniffing in gvfs
> > soon.
> Here is an updated version of the patch for the spec, using a less
> ambiguous title and adding some more details.
> Bastien, if there is no more feedback, can you commit this when you come
> back ?
That looks good to me, apart from ignore-case. I think we should default
to ignoring the case, as I can't think of any content types for which we
shouldn't (a pure 8.3 CD will show AUTORUN.INF, probably Autorun.inf for
Joliet, and autorun.inf with Rockridge/Unix support).
Could you send me your latest patches privately?
I'll take care of creating the test suite for the types we handle right
now, and probably update totem-pl-parser's totem-disc to use the
PS: Resent with the subscribed e-mail address...
More information about the xdg