[Icon-Naming-Spec] New icons proposal
stephan at xfce.org
Tue May 6 04:08:00 PDT 2008
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Stephan Arts <stephan at xfce.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Jakob Petsovits <jpetso at gmx.at> wrote:
> > On Friday, 18. April 2008, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 10:34 +0200, Stephan Arts wrote:
> > > > - system-shutdown
> > > > - system-reboot
> > > > - system-hibernate
> > >
> > > and system-suspend.
> > For KDE, we've used system-suspend and system-suspend-hibernate, so that the
> > latter can fall back to the former if the theme doesn't have both. (Because
> > essentially they're both "go to sleep" icons.)
> > I would love to see this scheme to be adopted, as I find it to be a nice
> > mixture between flexibility and not requiring too much from 3rd party theme
> > creators.
> > Also, we used system-restart instead of system-reboot, but that's more likely
> > just a matter of taste and a question of "who will need to adapt their icon
> > sets".
> > > There's some tango icons for suspend and hibernate in the
> > > gnome-power-manager package if anyone is interested. I would love these
> > > to go upstream tho, as we are also using custom icons in the gnome
> > > logout UI too.
> > Seconded. With all three of XFCE, GNOME and KDE using those icons, we should
> > really get them into the standard.
> system-suspend and system-suspend-hibernate seems a better approach indeed.
Could someone please add these icons to the icon-naming spec?
More information about the xdg