"minimal list of must have icons"
dobey.pwns at gmail.com
Sat Jan 3 09:45:45 PST 2009
The Icon Naming Specification itself only provides the minimal list of
names. I've changed the text you referenced, to clarify this, in CVS.
There will be addendums to provide lists of names for extra icons, such
as devices and MIME types.
The names in the spec itself are intended to be the base set, and thus
what everything falls back to, and so should be the priority when
creating a new theme.
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 17:30 +0300, Vasiliy Faronov wrote:
> The Icon Theme Specification 0.8.90, according to the Overview section,
> aims to "provid[e] a minimal list of must have icons, and a larger list
> with many more examples to help with the creation of extended icons
> for third party applications, devices, and new MIME types."
> However, as far as I can tell, the specification only contains one list
> of icons along with their names. No separation by priority.
> Is this the "must have" list, or the "larger one"?
> In general, are there any recommendations on the priority of icons
> (i.e. which ones are more essential)?
More information about the xdg