Starting discussion on a new version of the notification spec
Brian J. Tarricone
bjt23 at cornell.edu
Sat Jun 13 15:14:27 PDT 2009
On 06/13/2009 03:04 PM, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> What I wanted to say is that I read a lot of discussions on that issue
> and I learned nothing positive ever come out of those, so I'd rather
> talk about icons, markup and other things instead.
I suppose that's fair.
> The spec says actions are optional and I don't think Canonical wants to
> have this changed.
Personally, I *would* push to have this changed: making actions required
would ease implementation complexity on the app side.
> (Also note that I have personally nothing to do with the choice to go
> action-less, I was not even working for Canonical at the time of this
Well, as a representative of Canonical's interests as an employee,
that's not really relevant. You're here, and appear to have something
to do with notifications support in Ubuntu, so you're more than
"qualified" to weigh in on this topic, regardless of when the original
decision was made.
Admittedly, though, a discussion to try to get Canonical to change its
mind on this issue might not be appropriate for this list.
More information about the xdg