Starting discussion on a new version of the notification spec
aurelien.gateau at canonical.com
Mon Jun 15 03:27:18 PDT 2009
Mirco Müller wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 13.06.2009, 23:18 +0200 schrieb Aurélien Gâteau:
>>> 3. The Ubuntu spec adds a 'sound-themed' hint, while we already have
>>> 'sound-file'. I'd suggest just overloading 'sound-file' to take either
>>> a sound theme name or a sound file. Implementations that only support a
>>> full path will simply fail to play it; no big deal. With 'overloading',
>>> implementations don't have to handle Yet Another Hint. Downside: apps
>>> wishing to provide a sound theme name plus a fallback sound file path
>>> won't be able to. Is that a big deal? (There's also the cosmetic
>>> question as to what "sound-themed" logically means. It should be
>>> something like "sound-name" or "themed-sound-name".)
>> This is only present on the wiki page, notify-osd does not support sound
>> at all at the moment. I believe this is just a mistake.
> notify-osd not yet supporting sound (via libcanberra) is a "mistake" on
> my behalf.
The mistake I referred to was introducing a "sound-themed" hint on the
wiki when there is already "sound-file".
More information about the xdg