<tt>Havoc Pennington <hp@redhat.com> wrote on 04/07/2005 10:18:23 AM: > Previously I have posted: > http://www.gnome.org/projects/gconf/plans.html > which are some changes to make to gconf, with three of those changes > prioritized as more important vs. the others. > </tt> <tt>In these plans the client library is both a thin convenience layer over the D-BUS interface and responsible for loading/enforcing the schemas.  If I have this right, there are two client layers: raw configuration DBUS service, and validated configuration from a schema library.  Should these two layers be considered in separate specs?</tt> <tt> My interest in a configuration system is to provide desktop integration for Java applications.  The desires are:</tt> <tt>- Minimal amount of shared libraries in the client process.</tt> <tt>- Single api for all ui desktops.</tt> <tt>chas</tt>