2007/1/18, Fabrice Colin <<a href="mailto:fabrice.colin@gmail.com">fabrice.colin@gmail.com</a>>:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> On 1/17/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <<a href="mailto:mikkel.kamstrup@gmail.com">mikkel.kamstrup@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> Regarding the user-level language now. Perhaps "flying Dutchman" would mean<br> > the unstemmed phrase (if supported), and 'flying Dutchman' (single quotes)<br>> could allow for stemming. This is not completely standard, but it doesn't<br>> break user expectation in horrible ways (as far as I can see). <br>><br>I think it does. Double quotes usually express a phrase search.<br>My opinion is we'd better leave stemming (and diacritic sensitivity) out and let<br>each back-end play its specific strengths as it likes to find the best matches. </blockquote><div><br>Ok, the basic idea was simply that both '- and "-quoted strings would be phrase searches. Heuristically speaking " would be a hint to the search engine to be a little stricter on the matching than a '. <br><br>Cheers,<br>Mikkel<br> </div><br></div><br>