2007/2/21, Fabrice Colin <<a href="mailto:fabrice.colin@gmail.com">fabrice.colin@gmail.com</a>>:<div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> On 2/21/07, Jos van den Oever <<a href="mailto:jvdoever@gmail.com">jvdoever@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > 2007/2/20, Joe Shaw <<a href="mailto:joeshaw@novell.com">joeshaw@novell.com</a>>: > > Heh.  Fair enough.  Should we keep it simply to the search-side of > > things, then? > > The intention is to define a way to define metadata fields. This is > required for searching and useful for metadata read/write too. So lets > come up with the properties we allow metadata fields to have. I think > what we have so far is what is required for searching too. So this > will not be about an API for reading and writing. ></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Speaking of searching metadata, would it be useful to also define which metadata fields are to be treated as boolean filters and which allow probabilistic search ?</blockquote><div> Will this not be implicit in most cases? Do you have an example? Cheers, Mikkel </div></div>