2007/5/12, Evgeny Egorochkin <<a href="mailto:phreedom.stdin@gmail.com">phreedom.stdin@gmail.com</a>>:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Saturday 12 May 2007 13:39:51 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:<br>> > Any<br>> > > ideas on a temporary storage idea until we get a subversion module at<br>> > fdo?<br>> ><br>> > Wiki is ok. The only way I see this working is to authorize one person to
<br>> > make<br>> > changes to the onto. It's too small and has too many internal<br>> > dependencies to<br>> > allow ad-hoc editing. Changes should be proposed, discussed and only then<br>> > committed.
<br>> ><br>> > You still can use diff on wiki article contents and send patches for<br>> > discussion/approval.<br>><br>> Right. The key maintainer would still have to discuss things on the list I<br>
> take it?<br><br>Absolutely. Not so long ago you personally witnessed the benefits of<br>peer-review.<br><br>> Anyway, I would like to propose that Evgeny is our ontology-man (if he has<br>> the time (I haven't really talked to him about it)).
<br><br>I believe I'll spend much more time documenting my proposals, so I can handle<br>this as well.</blockquote><div><br>Cool. So it seems we have a taker for this task :-) How do you non-Strigi guys feel about this. Please chime in...
<br><br>Cheers,<br>Mikkel<br></div></div>