2007/8/4, Fabrice Colin <<a href="mailto:fabrice.colin@gmail.com">fabrice.colin@gmail.com</a>>:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi,<br><br>On 8/3/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <<a href="mailto:mikkel.kamstrup@gmail.com">mikkel.kamstrup@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> I've been collecting comments on the Xesam spec lately, and I think we have
<br>> enough now to do an update round of the spec proposal.<br>><br>> Proposed changes can be found here:<br>> <a href="http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/XesamSearchUpdates">http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/XesamSearchUpdates
</a><br>><br>Sorry for the late reply.<br><br>I am not sure I follow items 3 and 4. Can you explain ? ;-P<br>I agree with the rest. For 2. I would prefer a "xesam:category" field.</blockquote><div><br>Hi,<br>
<br>I've elaborated on 2, 3, and 4. I have to say that my opinion on (2) (which is also clear from the doc) is that we should split in two attrs on the query element. Reasons are on the site.<br></div><br><br>Cheers,
<br>Mikkel<br></div>