2007/8/8, Jos van den Oever <<a href="mailto:jvdoever@gmail.com">jvdoever@gmail.com</a>>:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> 2007/8/7, Thiago Macieira <<a href="mailto:thiago@kde.org">thiago@kde.org</a>>:<br>> Neither solution is a problem with QtDBus. The "bv" solution would<br>> generate larger messages, but faster parsing (QtDBus delays decoding of <br>> variants until actual use).<br><br>> In any case, we're discussing null types in D-Bus itself. This will<br>> probably require a new major message version...<br><br>So using the 'correct' 'bv' is faster. That is interesting. Especially <br>since quite a few NULL fields may appear.<br>So i am still in favor of 'aa(bv)'</blockquote><div><br>Is this really true? We need to parse the Variant no matter what...<br><br>Hmmm, in any case this is  binding dependant. <br></div><br></div>Cheers,<br>Mikkel<br>