2007/9/14, Shaun McCance <<a href="mailto:shaunm@gnome.org">shaunm@gnome.org</a>>:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 01:01 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:<br>> Man I love speaking to myself :-) Anyways, I just completed (4). Check<br>> it out at <a href="http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/XesamQueryLanguage">
http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/XesamQueryLanguage</a> and<br>> gimme the flames...<br><br>(I'm not involved in any way with any project that would<br>be implementing this. I just like reading specifications.)<br>
<br>Regarding the regExp extension, should the exact regular<br>expression syntax be specified? (Pointing to an existing<br>implementation of regexps would be sufficient.) I'm just<br>imagining a scenario where a regexp doesn't match what it
<br>should, because the client and the engine don't agree on<br>what means what.</blockquote><div><br>I've been digging about and it seems the Extended Regular Expressions or Perl Regexps are the only real candidates. Basic Regexp seems to simple.
<br><br>I will probably choose extended unless somebody yells.<br><br>Cheers,<br>Mikkel <br></div><br></div>