<div dir="ltr">On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Patryk Zawadzki <<a href="mailto:patrys@pld-linux.org">patrys@pld-linux.org</a>> wrote: <div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> What could also work: * if an icon name contains directory separators and starts with one, use absolute path * if an icon name contains directory separators and does not start with one, use relative path * if an icon name contains a dot (presumably extension), try relative lookup * if you reach this point, fall back to icon spec lookup -- Patryk Zawadzki </blockquote></div> Yes, this specification is a lot better than my version. I waited a while before responding to see if anyone else had any input, but it seems like no one does. Does this mean that my proposal is not worth discussion or just that no one have any complaints? Am I supposed to post this on Bugzilla when no more discussions are taking place, or do we make decisions right here on the list? -- Magnus Bergmark - magnus DOT bergmark AT gmail DOT com GPG/PGP: 0x7BE84794DB6AA648 Fingerprint: 0E6F D2DB F0EF 534A 2184 52AF 7BE8 4794 DB6A A648 </div>