[Xesam] Sorting API to be more flexible

[Arun Raghavan]

On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
<mikkel.kamstrup at gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> I think we have agreement on this. I have put it on the list of
> pending changes for the next release (be that 1.0 or RC3):
> http://xesam.org/main/XesamUpdates
>
> So if nobody starts complaining this one will go in. Speak now or
> forever hold your silence :-)

One question -- shouldn't the sort.order field now be a list of
strings of the length of sort.fields? I think this makes things a
little uglier, but is probably necessary.

Cheers,
-- 
Arun Raghavan
(http://nemesis.accosted.net)
v2sw5Chw4+5ln4pr6$OFck2ma4+9u8w3+1!m?l7+9GSCKi056
e6+9i4b8/9HTAen4+5g4/8APa2Xs8r1/2p5-8 hackerkey.com