[Xesam] condition of 1.0 ?
bob4mail at gmail.com
Thu Apr 23 11:39:56 PDT 2009
On Thursday 23 April 2009 16:16:01 you wrote:
> and it seems that a lot of the
> high-profile FOSS projects are moving towards the Nepomuk ontologies.
Until a Xesam specification isn't out, it seems obvious people will follow the
coolest and most hype'd project of the moment.
Anyway, I feel both Xesam and Nepomuk lack some degree of integration with
existing formats used above all across the web, but this is a too complex
concept to be summarized here, too poorly detailed to be exposed as a
proposal, too destructive about existing specifications, and I've read too
little documentation to be sure myself of this.
Let's think about 1.0, now ;-)
> Also about the ontology it was never cleared out what to do with
I don't found problems with current specification, also after reading stuffs
> I simply got suck up into
> starting out a new company in my spare time as well as having
> incredibly busy times in my day time job.
Is there any task which may be delegated to someone else, me for example?
Roberto -MadBob- Guido
More information about the Xesam