[Xorg] DRI merging
eta at lclark.edu
Sat Jun 12 10:47:07 PDT 2004
On Sat, 2004-06-12 at 07:44, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 23:17 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > I would like to see a merge from DRI CVS to X.Org in the near future.
> > Is there any opposition to this?
> No opposition, but a concern: Where are we going to integrate the DRI
> with the Composite extension, in the X.Org or DRI tree? I'd be in favour
> of moving the DRI tree to a branch of the X.Org tree altogether, but I'd
> like to hear what other people's current opinions are on this.
I was hoping that DRI work on pbuffers might go quickly and have the
drivers ready for rendering to targets besides the screen, which is what
we really need for Composite support. The other thing would be Damage,
but that'll be easy I think. I assume this would be done in the tree
where Composite gets integrated first, but again, I don't expect it to
be too hard if we can render to other targets.
I am definitely in favor of the DRI X tree stuff being a branch on the
Eric Anholt eta at lclark.edu
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt at FreeBSD.org
More information about the xorg