Old and new CVS repositories are available via rsync
roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
Sun Nov 21 23:42:06 PST 2004
Kevin E Martin wrote:
> > I've made the post-breakin version of CVS available for anonymous rsync
> > along with a relatively old version of CVS. We need help looking over the
> > differences in the repositories to make sure there aren't any 'unexpected'
> > changes.
> I looked at HEAD and each of the tags and branches. The only ones with
> differences between the two snapshots (besides HEAD) are:
> While I cannot comment on the correctness of the code, I've visually
> inspected the changes made to each of these branches/tags and have found
> no suspicious code.
> As expected, the majority of changes are on HEAD. I've visually
> inspected the changes on HEAD with the exception of Xprint and the SiS
> and VIA drivers. If Roland can confirm Xprint is okay and the SiS and
> VIA driver authors can verify that their driver code is okay, then I
> think the CVS snapshot from Nov 15 will be okay to use.
I've looked at the code and it seems to be OK... but I'd like to make a
final verification once the Nov15 tree is online again via doing a full
checkout and do a manually diff against my development tree (which
should only show the changes for the GIF DDX :)
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
/O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090
(;O/ \/ \O;)
More information about the xorg