The ati petition
volodya at mindspring.com
Sun Sep 5 17:23:58 PDT 2004
>>> to the same power-performance tradeoff for your graphics card and saving
>> Good point. I would imagine that since most of GPU is inactive under
>> regular X drivers I am running at minimum power ;)
> Unlikely. I suspect that, like with the CPU, the GPU speed must be
> manually slowed.
Unlike regular CPU, GPU consists of many blocks. I would expect that if 3d
engine is not used at all it consumes little power - kinda like running
HLT continuously on spare CPU.
>>> entirely unusable). On top of that, if I am at a non-1920x1600-type
>> Really ? I was not able to get ATI drivers working with my notebook (same
>> M10, same panel resolution) though I have not tried with latest drivers.
> I can get them to work as long as I stay at the resolutions described, and
> as long as I'm using XFree 4.3. Also, as I mentioned, the graphics go
> to pot after a little while when using the 3D. This is my "working". :)
>> This is the reason I started http://volodya-project.sf.net/R300.php - I
>> want 3d to play with some scientific visualization stuff..
> Did you get specs?
Yes and no. I have docss for 2d-related registers and very small part of
3d ones. The good news is that CP engine appears to work fine (which, by the
way, provides a large speedup for 2d - big enough that 2d windows games
play noticably faster in Wine).
I hoping that with careful munching of publicly available information and
a few test programs I can figure out parts of ATI 3d engine. For now I
would be happy with a small library that exercises polygonal graphics and
> Joseph===============================================trelane at digitasaru.net
> Graduate Student in Physics, Freelance Free Software Developer
More information about the xorg