New libXvMC wrapper.
ajax at nwnk.net
Tue Sep 21 15:54:35 PDT 2004
On Tuesday 21 September 2004 18:34, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> Hi, list!
> Anybody opposed to this going in it's current form? If not, it will be
> enabled for linux and gcc, where I know the -nostartfiles option will work.
Why do you need -nostartfiles?
As mentioned earlier, the XvMC protocol really should ask the server for the
name of the client driver to load, the way DRI does. But this is certainly
better than requiring every XvMC client to know about every possible driver.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the xorg