Solo Xgl..

[Dave Airlie]

> > Dave.
> 
> This is a good start. However, what I really like to see is a plain
> fb/mesa-solo backend in glitz, but I understand that this is a lot more
> work. If we're going to use miniglx for now I'd much rather see the glx
> backend be modified to work with miniglx as well as glx instead of a
> separate miniglx backend. A #ifdef USE_MINIGLX in glitz-glx.h would be
> OK. What else in the glx backend needs to be modified to make this work?

It might work but it might not, I was originally tempted to try this,
but it all started dragging in X headers and stuff, and as the miniglx
types aren't the same as the X ones, so I would wonder how binary
compatible these things would be, It probably isn't worth the effort
of creating a combined miniglx glitz interface, if we all have our way
miniglx should go away anyways...

> For Xgl, I guess a 'Xminiglx' server is useful until we get this stuff
> running directly on top of fb/mesa-solo. The sub-directory for this
> server should probably be 'miniglx'. For a future mesa-solo only server,
> I'd like a 'solo' sub-directory and a 'Xgl' executable. What do people
> think about this?

Sounds like the plan, I think the EGL thing is the definite future of
this stuff,

Dave.