Handling of driver protocol extensions in cvs
ajax at nwnk.net
Mon Jan 30 12:43:12 PST 2006
On Monday 23 January 2006 14:55, Philip Langdale wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm in the process of putting together a protocol extension
> for the vmware driver and I wanted to ask what the intended
> practice for organising such code is? Should I create a proto
> module for the headers which the driver would then depend
> on, and then a lib module for the client side bindings, as
> if it was a fullscale extension? Or is there some other
> preferred mechanism?
There is no preferred mechanism atm. Whatever makes your life easiest, I
suppose, though in the long term I would like as few driver-specific
extensions as possible.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the xorg