personal git trees on people instead of git?
airlied at gmail.com
Thu Jun 29 22:07:16 PDT 2006
> Now that Daniel has NFS mounted the git repo from kemper to annarchy,
> I'd like to reconsider where we store personal git repositories.
> Moving them from kemper(git) to annarchy(anongit,people) will allow
> people to manage repositories on their own using their shell account.
> With them on kemper, it's actually harder to create your own repo than
> commit on a branch in the central one. Ick.
> With this change, I'd also like to push for a general policy that
> personal development be done in personal repositories. With git's
> ability to share files across repositories, this doesn't present any
> disk space concern. It also permits anyone with an account to publish
> changes for any fd.o project.
> Does this seem sensible?
This is pretty much how I believe it should always have been done, I'd
like to add the additional suggestion of maybe running two gitwebs,
one for "offical" repos and one for user ones..
More information about the xorg