personal git trees on people instead of git?
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Fri Jun 30 06:51:17 PDT 2006
On 6/30/06, Daniel Stone <daniel at freedesktop.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:21:47PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> > Now that Daniel has NFS mounted the git repo from kemper to annarchy,
> > I'd like to reconsider where we store personal git repositories.
> > Moving them from kemper(git) to annarchy(anongit,people) will allow
> > people to manage repositories on their own using their shell account.
> > With them on kemper, it's actually harder to create your own repo than
> > commit on a branch in the central one. Ick.
> > With this change, I'd also like to push for a general policy that
> > personal development be done in personal repositories. With git's
> > ability to share files across repositories, this doesn't present any
> > disk space concern. It also permits anyone with an account to publish
> > changes for any fd.o project.
> > Does this seem sensible?
> +1. We can have separate gitwebs, and have:
> (Of course, anongit.fd.o/git/users/... will work, and conversely so will
> people.fd.o/git/xorg/..., but whatever.)
It would also be nice to have mailing lists for git commits from both trees.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v22.214.171.124 (GNU/Linux)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> xorg mailing list
> xorg at lists.freedesktop.org
More information about the xorg