Named initialisers and other hilarity
daniel at fooishbar.org
Thu Sep 21 05:04:55 PDT 2006
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 02:33:50AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> I was diving through some KDrive code today and it annoyed me enough to
> wonder seriously about named initialisers. A quick straw poll on IRC
> suggests that we really want named initialisers, inlines (goodbye
> hundred-line macros of despair), mixed code and declarations, and
> variadic macros (goodbye DPRINTF((x))).
> Are there any platforms that either support 7.x, or will realistically
> support 7.x quite soon, that don't support these features? Full C99
> compliance is uninteresting since a) the features aren't that
> interesting, and b) gcc doesn't even do it; but mandating those four
> specific features would be magic.
x11proto 7.0.8 brings _X_INLINE. Have at it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the xorg