Some questions about xf86-video-intel driver
kyle at freedesktop.org
Fri Oct 19 15:45:51 PDT 2007
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 04:37:18PM +0200, Simon Pasch wrote:
> Hello list!
> I have some problems with the intel driver in xorg. The memory usage
> of a self compiled X is nearly 260MB. With the vesa-driver it only
> needs some Megs.
mmap of the graphics aperture is accounted for in this total.
> My Hardware Configuration:
> intel 945gm
> I used:
> xorg-server 1.4
> x86-video-intel 2.1.1
> linux 18.104.22.168
> (Tried to use Mesa 7.0.1, libdrm 2.3.0, too)
> I only need 2D...
> After a week of trying I'm stuck now...
> My questions are: (please keep in mind, that I'm a X-newbie...)
> - Am I right, that the Intel driver needs DRI for accelerated 2D, too?
> (is the missing DRI-usage possibly the reason, why X reserves so much
DRI is needed for EXA, but not for XAA (so the answer is "sorta" since
XAA is the default at the moment.)
> - Do I need Mesa, if I only want to use 2D? Do I need Mesa to get DRI working?
You don't need Mesa for 2D, but you need it for anything that uses GL
(it provides libGL.) Mesa provides the userspace component of direct
rendering, so yes.
> -The Kernel apggart driver reports that the AGP aperture size is
> 256MB. Is this possibly the reason, why X eats all the mem? (don't
> have a BIOS option to lower the AGP aperture size)
> -What do I have to do, that the intel-driver uses the kernel-drm?
> (currently it makes no difference, if the i915-module is loaded or
Run "xdriinfo" to see.
> -Do I use the right combination of program-versions?
> -Do you have an idea, what's the reason for the huge memory-allocation?
> I tried to lower the VideoRam by defining it in xorg.conf, but the
> driver reported:
> (WW) intel(0): VideoRam configuration found, which is no longer recommended.
> (II) intel(0): Continuing with default 262144kB VideoRam instead of 8192 kB.
You can just nuke it, it's fine.
> I'm thankful for any hint...
> xorg mailing list
> xorg at lists.freedesktop.org
More information about the xorg