10-50% CPU used by xorg?
dkasak at nusconsulting.com.au
Wed Feb 27 19:14:03 PST 2008
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 11:45 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> EXA is bound to be slow on 965 until we land the render fixes
> sitting on intel-batchbuffer, but we could probably just cherry-pick
> them out since they're orthogonal to the batchbuffer work). But if
> you're seeing issues on 915 or earlier, the only improvement we're
> expecting to see is from TTM-backed buffers, which might help if
> limited by migration (or might not).
> If you're seeing performance issues on 915 or earlier, profile now
> because there's a good chance that what you're seeing doesn't have a
> in the pipeline.
OK. I've done a bit of reading on oprofile. Apparently I have to have
'things' compiled with debugging symbols. Can someone please provide a
list of relevant 'things'? *Everything* on my system is compiled without
debugging symbols, but I'll fix that if someone gives me a list.
I assume I'll need:
Right? More? Less?
NUS Consulting Group
Level 5, 77 Pacific Highway
North Sydney, NSW, Australia 2060
T: (+61) 2 9922-7676 / F: (+61) 2
email: dkasak at nusconsulting.com.au
More information about the xorg