New tinderbox.

[Florian Mickler]

On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:42:52 -0800
Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz at gentoo.org> wrote:

> On 17:16 Thu 31 Jan     , Chris Ball wrote:
> >    * Is the split of having some machines build an expected-working
> >      server and others build expected-broken drivers useful?  Should
> >      I consider instead removing anything that's long-term broken
> >      from the build?
> 
> I think it's useful to have current status of what's broken, even if 
> it's been broken for a while. Whether it builds is better than any 
> documentation that could be out of date. It could be a nice place for 
> potential new developers to find something to fix.

i agree. (as a potential new developer, that is) 

having that git-history link would also be useful, so that you can see
how active that repository is... 

 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20080228/d75fe288/attachment.pgp>