RandR 1.3 additions?
keithp at keithp.com
Tue Jan 22 01:16:41 PST 2008
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 02:04 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> I would argue that connectors
> are a better choice as that's what the user sees.
Right, I want to at least allow the details of the hardware to be hidden
by default and communicate with the user in terms of visible physical
> the outputs would still handle the detect() functionality, and they
> would choose the encoder. A driver that didn't want to use the
> encoders abstraction would still work so drivers could gradually
> update or not.
I'm not sure we need anything other than an output property that selects
the desired encoder; is there something extra here?
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the xorg