[PATCH 1/2] Since G965 class hardware has overlay too, enable it
redchin at gmail.com
Fri Mar 7 15:08:29 PST 2008
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Robert Lowery <rglowery at exemail.com.au> wrote:
> > On Friday, February 29, 2008 9:12 am Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> >> From 140320b85c634ad58701243fde3ff41cdcf1863d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky at gmail.com>
> >> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:31:35 +0200
> >> Subject: [PATCH] Since G965 class hardware has overlay too, enable it
> >> *replace explicit checks for G965 for having no overlay since it has
> >> one,
> >> with general check for future chips that may have no overlay.
> >> *make overlay registers to be mapped correctly for G965
> >> *remove a check for register bit that isn't present on G965
> >> "(INREG(pipeconf_reg) & PIPEACONF_DOUBLE_WIDE)"
> > Awesome, thanks Maxim. I hacked up this patch a little and pushed it as
> > 5915c75422c5277d530e7f8ecbdfe94654706efd. Please test it out and make
> > sure
> > everything's ok. I ended up killing the HW_HAS_OVERLAY check (should be
> > easy
> > enough to add back in later if needed) since we don't seem to need it at
> > all
> > right now.
> > I'll hold off on pushing the textured video disable option unless there's
> > lots
> > of demand, since users can already select which port they want in their
> > applications.
> I believe mythtv will always use the first port so without a change to
> myth, the textured video disable option is required
> > Thanks,
> > Jesse
Maybe the order of the ports could be switched?
The Mafia way is that we pursue larger goals under the guise of
More information about the xorg