Intel: how's dynamic framebuffer allocation coming?
ajax at nwnk.net
Thu Oct 16 12:10:23 PDT 2008
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 14:07 -0400, Joel Feiner wrote:
> Just to satisfy my curiosity, why was it that with MergedFB on radeon
> (before randr 1.2) I was able to have full acceleration across two
> screens? Was there no scan out limit in that particular case or was
> there some other workaround?
There's a scanout limit, you just weren't hitting it. RANDR 1.2 on
radeons should be exactly as accelerated as the old mergedfb code was.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the xorg