[ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 126.96.36.1991
keithp at keithp.com
Sun Jul 26 21:22:59 PDT 2009
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 15:04 -0700, Paul Bender wrote:
> Does that mean the there is really no point to submitting bugs to
No, this isn't related to bug tracking, only for merging known fixes to
the 1.6 branch. The 1.6 branch is supposed to get only known good
patches cherry-picked from the master branch, so any bugs found in the
1.6 branch should be re-checked with the master branch, fixed there and
then nominated for a 1.6 minor release.
Most (all?) of the fixes nominated for the 1.6 branch were initially
bugs reported against master, fixed there and then cherry-picked to the
1.6 branch; you'll see notes on the wiki indicating which bugs are being
fixed by each patch.
Using the wiki page lets me collect a bunch of suitable fixes and then
cut a minor release without missing anything. I've found it easier to
manage than a bugzilla tracking bug, especially as it leaves a very
clear history through the whole process.
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the xorg