[Clipart] Website content
jon at protofunk.org
Tue Mar 16 12:40:54 PST 2004
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 12:33, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Ted Gould wrote:
> > > 1) File format. At one point we had talked about doing both PNGs and
> > > SVGs - but Chris brought up the good point that SVGs can do everything
> > > PNGs can, plus they're vectored. So what about having the entire
> > > repository be SVG? I have no problem with that.
> > SVG is fine, because we can always provide a script or some tool or
> > instructions to convert to PNG.
> I think what he meant is as an input format. E.g., should raster images
> like photos be included?
I think SVG for the first few release, and then move to raster
afterwards. We have to do one unique thing first. But we should map out
our plan and name so that it is vector-centric rather than could be
adapted for upcoming formats.
> A collection of raster clipart would be useful but I wonder if it might
> be better to focus on the vector clipart first. There are already many
> photo, pattern, etc. collections online, whereas availability of vector
> clipart is much more limited so that's an area we can provide more of a
> unique value.
> > We should start working on the metadata.
> > Name (maybe filename?)
> > Description
> > Keywords
> > Date of contribution
> > Original artist/contributor
> > Original artist/contributor email (or contact information)
> > Copyright/License information (if we don't require same for all)
> > Image format?? with version (like some SVG software supports different
> > SVG features)
> Perhaps also look at existing metadata formats such as Dublin Core. It
> would be sensible to tie in with schemes that other apps will already be
Yes, we should consider dublincore, but I'm hyper in favor of XMP right
now, as in Inkscape, one of our developers is implementing it, adobe has
it implemented in all of their apps, and so on. We need to post these
concerns tot he wiki and hash them out....
> > > 3) Name. The project needs an official name, I'm happy with
> > > clipart.freedesktop.org, but I also like UnCAP (for Unified ClipArt
> > > Project). I think that we need to select that relatively quickly -
> > > atleast before we start to market the repository.
> > clipart.freedesktop.org is fine for me.
> Works for me too.
Yeah, lets stick with that for the first while...we need to get our
organization sorted out. I really like UnCAP, as it implies much...
> > > 4) License. I think everything should have to be public domain, is
> > > there any issue with that?
> > Public domain works for me. If it is public domain, it must be documented:
> > source and original date and original artist and agreement saying it is
> > public domain.
> I'm in agreement as well.
PD is great...
> > I'd also like to include old artwork that is obviously public domain, but
> > of course, it should be documented too.
> It'd be great to have an archive of historical imagery but there's so
> much of it - 3000 years worth. :-)
Yeah, I'm really stoked about this. I could write a mountain about how
this is sooooo necessarily and especially since much
interactive/generative content generation systems (likenarrative
generation) are increasingly relying on metadata in media objects.
I'm soooooo excited about this project... :)
> Clipart mailing list
> Clipart at freedesktop.org
Visual Arts Department
PO BOX 948667
LA JOLLA, CA USA
jon at jonphillips.info
More information about the clipart