glib encapsulation patch
oliv__a at users.sourceforge.net
Fri Jun 18 07:36:56 PDT 2004
Havoc Pennington <hp at redhat.com> [Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:45:23 -0400]:
> I didn't commit this yet, want to think about it a bit more.
> What do people think?
> It's not quite complete, since the GLib bindings aren't quite complete.
> Notably all the varargs stuff isn't redone to fully use G-types, signal
> marshaling is left hanging, etc. And of course you still can't implement
> a server since dbus-glib-tool isn't done.
What would be the API like with signals ? smthg like that:
dbus_gproxy_connect_signal(proxy, "Foo", "us", G_CALLBACK (handler));
"us" being the signature and the handler would be:
void handler (DBusGProxy*, guint32, gchar *)
More information about the dbus