[Xlibs] Relicensing the code tree

[Daniel Stone]

--bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 12:53:25PM +0200, ash@contact.bg wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I want to know if there is any interest in a relicencing project for the=
=20
> xserver (and/or xlibs)?
> This question is only prompted by the change of the current XFree86 licen=
se,=20
> but the true reason is their licensing policy up till now - to accept pat=
ches=20
> and contributions with varying licenses [1]. (I hate license promiscuity!=
 [2] =20
> Brings complications and license fights.)
> Is there any project for bringing some order to the licensing situation?
> Or hope for a project? Or any positive thought for such a project?
> I know it will be a daunting task given the need to contact many contribu=
tors -
>  developers and firms. (and I have some idea for the timescale for this q=
uest,=20
> given the Mozilla experience). But I do get the feeling that this is nece=
ssary.

xlibs and xserver are licensed under the MIT/X11 license, which is
completely free of any license-related problems, and GPL-compatible.

--=20
Daniel Stone                                            <daniel@freedesktop=
.org>
freedesktop.org: powering your desktop                http://www.freedeskto=
p.org

--bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFANztUcPClnTztfv0RAihGAJ980X0S9LEAZI1I2t0v2InnxnnfggCfV32R
MPSztSS9C/lwHLqB4wrDcZM=
=JBH2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn--