[V2 0/6] drm/amdgpu: add support SR-IOV initialization

[Yu, Xiangliang]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Deucher [mailto:alexdeucher at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 2:16 PM
> To: Yu, Xiangliang <Xiangliang.Yu at amd.com>
> Cc: amd-gfx list <amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
> Subject: Re: [V2 0/6] drm/amdgpu: add support SR-IOV initialization
> 
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Xiangliang Yu <Xiangliang.Yu at amd.com>
> wrote:
> > As SR-IOV initialization is difference from bare metal, the series
> > patch will change code path of initialization according to HW design.
> >
> > Changes in V2:
> > 1. Remove VM fault patch;
> > 2. Split out the third patch into two patches to make more clear;
> >
> > Xiangliang Yu (6):
> >   drm/amdgpu: drop redundant vi_mqd define
> >   drm/amd/powerplay: cut digest part
> >   drm/amd/powerplay: Ignore smu buffer usage
> >   drm/amd/powerplay: Adjust the position of data size initial
> >   drm/amdgpu: Don't touch GFX hw during HW fini
> >   drm/amd/powerplay: Fix potential NULL pointer issue
> >
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c              | 270 +--------------------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amd_powerplay.c      |   4 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/smu7_smumgr.c |  19 +-
> >  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 268 deletions(-)
> 
> Patches 1-5 are:
> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
> 
> I didn't see patch 6, but presumably it's the same NULL pointer fix you send
> out previously.

Yes, exactly same patch