[PATCH] drm/amd/powerplay: don't give up if DPM is already running

Zhu, Rex Rex.Zhu at amd.com
Fri Oct 14 12:12:25 UTC 2016


 Hi Alex,

Your new attached patch is Tested-by and Reviewed-by: Rex Zhu <Rex.Zhu at amd.com>

Just one question,

Do we need to set clock_gate for smu? 

Best Regards
Rex


-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Deucher [mailto:alexdeucher at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 11:29 PM
To: Zhu, Rex
Cc: Grazvydas Ignotas; amd-gfx list; Maling list - DRI developers
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/powerplay: don't give up if DPM is already running

 On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:45 AM, Zhu, Rex <Rex.Zhu at amd.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The attached patches were also for this issue.
> Disable dpm when rmmod amdgpu.
>
> Please help to review.

Patch 1:
+    r = adev->ip_blocks[AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_SMC].funcs->hw_fini((void *)adev);
+    if (r)
+        DRM_DEBUG("hw_fini of IP block <%s> failed %d\n",
+            adev->ip_blocks[AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_SMC].funcs->name, r);
+
+    adev->ip_block_status[AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_SMC].hw = false;

You can't use AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_* as index.  Some chips may not have the IP block.  Maybe something like the attached patch.  That said, I think longer term it makes more sense to allows the SOCs to specify the order for init, fini, etc. otherwise we'll have lots of variable logic in the common code.

Patch 2:
+    if (1 == PHM_READ_VFPF_INDIRECT_FIELD(hwmgr->device,
CGS_IND_REG__SMC, FEATURE_STATUS, AVS_ON)) {
+        PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE((0 == smum_send_msg_to_smc(hwmgr->smumgr,
PPSMC_MSG_DisableAvfs)),
+                    "Failed to disable AVFS!",
+                    return -1;);
+    }

Use a proper error code there like -EINVAL or something.  With that fixed:
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>

Alex

>
> Best Regards
> Rex
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf 
> Of Zhu, Rex
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 9:45 PM
> To: Alex Deucher; Grazvydas Ignotas
> Cc: amd-gfx list; Maling list - DRI developers
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/amd/powerplay: don't give up if DPM is 
> already running
>
> Hi Grazvydas and Alex,
>
> We needed to disable dpm when rmmod amdgpu for this issue.
>
> I am checking the function of disable dpm task.
>
> Best Regards
> Rex
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Deucher [mailto:alexdeucher at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 4:01 AM
> To: Grazvydas Ignotas; Zhu, Rex
> Cc: Maling list - DRI developers; amd-gfx list
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/powerplay: don't give up if DPM is 
> already running
>
> +Rex to review this.
>
> Alex
>
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Currently the driver crashes if smu7_enable_dpm_tasks() returns 
>> early, which it does if DPM is already active. It seems to be better 
>> just to continue anyway, at least I haven't noticed any ill effects. 
>> It's also unclear at what state the hardware was left by the previous 
>> driver, so IMO it's better to always fully initialize.
>>
>> Way to reproduce:
>> $ modprobe amdgpu
>> $ rmmod amdgpu
>> $ modprobe amdgpu
>> ...
>> DPM is already running right now, no need to enable DPM!
>> ...
>> failed to send message 18b ret is 0
>> BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffed01fc9ab21f Call
>> Trace:
>>  smu7_set_power_state_tasks+0x499/0x1940 [amdgpu]
>>  phm_set_power_state+0xcb/0x120 [amdgpu]
>>  psm_adjust_power_state_dynamic+0x11e/0x1b0 [amdgpu]
>>  pem_task_adjust_power_state+0xb9/0xd0 [amdgpu]
>>  pem_excute_event_chain+0x7d/0xe0 [amdgpu]
>>  pem_handle_event_unlocked+0x49/0x60 [amdgpu]
>>  pem_handle_event+0xe/0x10 [amdgpu]
>>  pp_dpm_dispatch_tasks+0xe0/0x190 [amdgpu]
>>  amdgpu_pm_compute_clocks+0x10c/0xc60 [amdgpu]
>>  dce_v11_0_crtc_dpms+0x7d/0x150 [amdgpu]
>>  dce_v11_0_crtc_disable+0x90/0x4a0 [amdgpu]
>>  drm_helper_disable_unused_functions+0x67/0x80 [drm_kms_helper]
>>  amdgpu_fbdev_init+0x13e/0x170 [amdgpu]
>>  amdgpu_device_init+0x1aeb/0x2490 [amdgpu]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c
>> index f6afa6a..327030b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c
>> @@ -1166,8 +1166,8 @@ static int smu7_enable_dpm_tasks(struct 
>> pp_hwmgr
>> *hwmgr)
>>
>>         tmp_result = (!smum_is_dpm_running(hwmgr)) ? 0 : -1;
>>         PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(tmp_result == 0,
>> -                       "DPM is already running right now, no need to enable DPM!",
>> -                       return 0);
>> +                       "DPM is already running",
>> +                       );
>>
>>         if (smu7_voltage_control(hwmgr)) {
>>                 tmp_result = smu7_enable_voltage_control(hwmgr);
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> amd-gfx mailing list
>> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx


More information about the amd-gfx mailing list