[PATCH 1/3] drm/amd/amdgpu: Add wave reader to debugfs

[StDenis, Tom]

Hi Alex,


Sounds like a plan since I want to add a few fields anyways.


Tom


________________________________
From: Deucher, Alexander
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 09:33
To: StDenis, Tom; Nicolai Hähnle
Cc: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] drm/amd/amdgpu: Add wave reader to debugfs


You could make the wave decode a gfx callback and move the code into the IP modules.



Alex



From: amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of StDenis, Tom
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 6:56 AM
To: Nicolai Hähnle
Cc: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/amd/amdgpu: Add wave reader to debugfs



Hi Nicolai,



I was trying to avoid having ASIC specific includes/etc in the amdgpu_device.c file.  Agreed that de-numberifying it would be nice.  Maybe we can add some /**/ comments to clear it up.  I imagine in the future we'll add more fields (upto 32 in this design) anyways.



Cheers,

Tom



________________________________

From: Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle at gmail.com<mailto:nhaehnle at gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 03:25
To: Tom St Denis; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: StDenis, Tom
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/amd/amdgpu: Add wave reader to debugfs



On 11.10.2016 21:18, Tom St Denis wrote:
> Currently supports CZ/VI.  Allows nearly atomic read
> of wave data from GPU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis at amd.com<mailto:tom.stdenis at amd.com>>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> index 89b353418195..b1ab6358fa0f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> @@ -2914,6 +2914,72 @@ static ssize_t amdgpu_debugfs_sensor_read(struct file *f, char __user *buf,
>        return !r ? 4 : r;
>  }
>
> +static uint32_t wave_read_ind(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t SQ_INDEX, uint32_t SQ_DATA, uint32_t simd, uint32_t wave, uint32_t address)
> +{
> +     WREG32(SQ_INDEX, (wave & 0xF) | ((simd & 0x3) << 4) | (address << 16) | (1 << 13));
> +     return RREG32(SQ_DATA);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t amdgpu_debugfs_wave_read(struct file *f, char __user *buf,
> +                                     size_t size, loff_t *pos)
> +{
> +     struct amdgpu_device *adev = f->f_inode->i_private;
> +     int r, x;
> +     ssize_t result=0;
> +     uint32_t offset, se, sh, cu, wave, simd, data[16];
> +
> +     if (size & 3 || *pos & 3)
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     /* decode offset */
> +     offset = (*pos & 0x7F);
> +     se = ((*pos >> 7) & 0xFF);
> +     sh = ((*pos >> 15) & 0xFF);
> +     cu = ((*pos >> 23) & 0xFF);
> +     wave = ((*pos >> 31) & 0xFF);
> +     simd = ((*pos >> 37) & 0xFF);
> +     *pos &= 0x7F;
> +
> +     /* switch to the specific se/sh/cu */
> +     mutex_lock(&adev->grbm_idx_mutex);
> +     amdgpu_gfx_select_se_sh(adev, se, sh, cu);
> +
> +     x = 0;
> +     if (adev->family == AMDGPU_FAMILY_CZ || adev->family == AMDGPU_FAMILY_VI) {
> +             /* type 0 wave data */
> +             data[x++] = 0;
> +             data[x++] = wave_read_ind(adev, 0x2378, 0x2379, simd, wave, 0x12);
> +             data[x++] = wave_read_ind(adev, 0x2378, 0x2379, simd, wave, 0x18);
> +             data[x++] = wave_read_ind(adev, 0x2378, 0x2379, simd, wave, 0x19);
> +             data[x++] = wave_read_ind(adev, 0x2378, 0x2379, simd, wave, 0x27E);
> +             data[x++] = wave_read_ind(adev, 0x2378, 0x2379, simd, wave, 0x27F);
> +             data[x++] = wave_read_ind(adev, 0x2378, 0x2379, simd, wave, 0x14);
> +             data[x++] = wave_read_ind(adev, 0x2378, 0x2379, simd, wave, 0x1A);
> +             data[x++] = wave_read_ind(adev, 0x2378, 0x2379, simd, wave, 0x1B);

I know this is just debug code, but it's still annoying to have all
these magic constants here, when there are perfectly good ixSQ_WAVE_*
etc. defines in the asic_reg headers.

Nicolai

> +     } else {
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }
> +
> +     amdgpu_gfx_select_se_sh(adev, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF);
> +     mutex_unlock(&adev->grbm_idx_mutex);
> +
> +     while (size && (*pos < x * 4)) {
> +             uint32_t value;
> +
> +             value = data[*pos >> 2];
> +             r = put_user(value, (uint32_t *)buf);
> +             if (r)
> +                     return r;
> +
> +             result += 4;
> +             buf += 4;
> +             *pos += 4;
> +             size -= 4;
> +     }
> +
> +     return result;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct file_operations amdgpu_debugfs_regs_fops = {
>        .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>        .read = amdgpu_debugfs_regs_read,
> @@ -2951,6 +3017,12 @@ static const struct file_operations amdgpu_debugfs_sensors_fops = {
>        .llseek = default_llseek
>  };
>
> +static const struct file_operations amdgpu_debugfs_wave_fops = {
> +     .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +     .read = amdgpu_debugfs_wave_read,
> +     .llseek = default_llseek
> +};
> +
>  static const struct file_operations *debugfs_regs[] = {
>        &amdgpu_debugfs_regs_fops,
>        &amdgpu_debugfs_regs_didt_fops,
> @@ -2958,6 +3030,7 @@ static const struct file_operations *debugfs_regs[] = {
>        &amdgpu_debugfs_regs_smc_fops,
>        &amdgpu_debugfs_gca_config_fops,
>        &amdgpu_debugfs_sensors_fops,
> +     &amdgpu_debugfs_wave_fops,
>  };
>
>  static const char *debugfs_regs_names[] = {
> @@ -2967,6 +3040,7 @@ static const char *debugfs_regs_names[] = {
>        "amdgpu_regs_smc",
>        "amdgpu_gca_config",
>        "amdgpu_sensors",
> +     "amdgpu_wave",
>  };
>
>  static int amdgpu_debugfs_regs_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20161014/7218aa1f/attachment-0001.html>