[pull] radeon and amdgpu drm-next-4.9

[Lukas Wunner]

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 04:42:43PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>       drm/amdgpu: skip suspend/resume on DRM_SWITCH_POWER_DYNAMIC_OFF
>       drm/radeon: skip suspend/resume on DRM_SWITCH_POWER_DYNAMIC_OFF

Those two are unnecessary, it can't happen that the ->suspend hook
is executed with the device runtime suspended.

Since commit d14d2a8453d6 ("drm: Remove dev_pm_ops from drm_class"),
DRM devices are afforded direct_complete, i.e. if the GPU is runtime
suspended upon system sleep, it is left in this state.  The only
callbacks that are executed are the ->prepare and the ->complete hook.
All the callbacks in-between, like ->suspend, are skipped.

Even if direct_complete is not afforded for some reason, the PM core
will automatically runtime resume the device before executing ->suspend.

That ->suspend is skipped in the DRM_SWITCH_POWER_OFF case was done
because the device is suspended behind the PM core's back if runpm=0
is set.  (And it doesn't work properly because the PCI core will
invalidate the saved_state during ->resume_noirq.  That could be
solved by returning 1 from the ->prepare hook in the DRM_SWITCH_POWER_OFF
case, but that's a different story.)

(Sorry for not raising this earlier, I'm not subscribed to amd-gfx.)

Best regards,

Lukas