[PATCH] drm: Harmonize CIK ASIC support in radeon and amdgpu (v2)

Nicolai Hähnle nhaehnle at gmail.com
Tue Apr 25 18:06:26 UTC 2017


On 25.04.2017 08:28, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 22/04/17 02:05 AM, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>> __setup doesn't work in modules.
>
> Right. We could build something like
> drivers/video/fbdev/core/fb_cmdline.c:video_setup() into the kernel to
> handle this, but it's a bit ugly, which is one reason why I was leaning
> towards:
>
>
>> s8250_options is only compiled if the driver is not a module.
>
> That doesn't prevent us from using __module_param_call directly, does it?
>
> Although, that still doesn't work as I envision if only one driver's
> option is set e.g. in /etc/modprobe.d/*.conf .
>
>
> So, I'm starting to think we need a shared module for this, which
> provides one or multiple module parameters to choose which driver to use
> for CIK/SI[0], and provides the result to the amdgpu/radeon drivers.
> That might make things easier for amdgpu-pro / other standalone amdgpu
> versions in the long run as well, as they could add files to
> /etc/modprobe.d/ choosing themselves by default, without having to
> blacklist radeon.
>
> What do you guys think?

I suspect that adding an entire module just to select between two other 
modules is the kind of thing that should be discussed in a wider 
audience first.

It is probably the cleanest solution that doesn't require teaching the 
general modprobe architecture about having multiple modules for the same 
PCI ID...

Cheers,
Nicolai


>
>
> [0] or possibly even more fine-grained in the future
>


-- 
Lerne, wie die Welt wirklich ist,
Aber vergiss niemals, wie sie sein sollte.


More information about the amd-gfx mailing list