[PATCH] Improve pipe split between amdgpu and amdkfd v4

[Andres Rodriguez]

Thanks for taking the time with the multiple iterations of the series!

Regards,
Andres

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Andres Rodriguez <andresx7 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hey Oded,
>>
>> Let us know if you can reproduce the kfdtest results on your side.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Andres
>>
>>
>
> Hi Andres,
> I run the kfdtest on your patch-set with KAVERI machine, and all the
> tests passed :)
> I've also gone over your code and it seems fine.
>
> So, this patch-set is:
> Acked-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay at gmail.com>
>
>
>
>> On 2017-04-21 04:02 PM, Andres Rodriguez wrote:
>>>
>>> V4 updates:
>>>  * Rebased onto latest 4.12-wip (ba16d6c), since I got test reports that
>>> the
>>>    patch series failed to apply
>>>
>>> V3 updates:
>>>  * Fixed kfd set resources grabbing MEC1 queues
>>>  * kfdtest now passes on Kaveri with the amdgpu or radeon driver
>>>
>>> V2 updates:
>>>  * Fixed wrong HPD offset in compute_pipe_init for gfx7
>>>  * Fixed compute_pipe_init using wrong ME for gfx7
>>>
>>>
>>> This is a split of patches that are ready to land from the series:
>>> Add support for high priority scheduling in amdgpu v8
>>>
>>> I've included Felix and Alex's feedback from the thread above. This
>>> includes:
>>>  * Separate MEC_HPD_SIZE rename into a separate patch (patch 01)
>>>  * Added a patch to fix the kgd_hqd_load bug Felix pointed out (patch 06)
>>>  * Fixes for various off-by-one errors
>>>  * Use gfx_v8_0_deactivate_hqd
>>>
>>> Only comment I didn't address was changing the queue allocation policy for
>>> gfx9 (similar to gfx7/8). See inline reply in that thread for more details
>>> on why this was skipped.
>>>
>>>
>>> Series available in the wip-queue-policy-v4 branch at:
>>> git at github.com:lostgoat/linux.git
>>> Or:
>>> https://github.com/lostgoat/linux.git
>>>
>>>
>>