[PATCH libdrm 2/4] amdgpu: Use new suite/test disabling functionality.
Emil Velikov
emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Fri Dec 15 18:08:40 UTC 2017
On 10 November 2017 at 04:30, Andrey Grodzovsky
<andrey.grodzovsky at amd.com> wrote:
> Switch from disabling tests during run to using the new disable
> API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky at amd.com>
> ---
> tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_test.c | 14 ++++++--
> tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_test.h | 15 ++++++++
> tests/amdgpu/deadlock_tests.c | 8 +----
> tests/amdgpu/uvd_enc_tests.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> tests/amdgpu/vce_tests.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> tests/amdgpu/vcn_tests.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 6 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_test.c b/tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_test.c
> index 68ec5d3..91010dc 100644
> --- a/tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_test.c
> +++ b/tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_test.c
> @@ -150,15 +150,15 @@ static Suites_Active_Status suites_active_stat[] = {
> },
> {
> .pName = VCE_TESTS_STR,
> - .pActive = always_active,
> + .pActive = suite_vce_tests_enable,
> },
> {
> .pName = VCN_TESTS_STR,
> - .pActive = always_active,
> + .pActive = suite_vcn_tests_enable,
> },
> {
> .pName = UVD_ENC_TESTS_STR,
> - .pActive = always_active,
> + .pActive = suite_uvd_enc_tests_enable,
> },
> {
> .pName = DEADLOCK_TESTS_STR,
> @@ -409,6 +409,14 @@ static void amdgpu_disable_suits()
> if (amdgpu_set_suite_active(suites_active_stat[i].pName,
> suites_active_stat[i].pActive()))
> fprintf(stderr, "suit deactivation failed - %s\n", CU_get_error_msg());
> +
> + /* Explicitly disable specific tests due to known bugs or preferences */
> + /*
> + * BUG: Compute ring stalls and never recovers when the address is
> + * written after the command already submitted
> + */
> + if (amdgpu_set_test_active(DEADLOCK_TESTS_STR, "compute ring block test", CU_FALSE))
> + fprintf(stderr, "test deactivation failed - %s\n", CU_get_error_msg());
> }
>
> /* The main() function for setting up and running the tests.
> diff --git a/tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_test.h b/tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_test.h
> index 9ccc1ff..dd236ed 100644
> --- a/tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_test.h
> +++ b/tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_test.h
> @@ -100,6 +100,11 @@ int suite_vce_tests_init();
> int suite_vce_tests_clean();
>
> /**
> + * Decide if the suite is enabled by default or not.
> + */
> +CU_BOOL suite_vce_tests_enable(void);
> +
> +/**
> * Tests in vce test suite
> */
> extern CU_TestInfo vce_tests[];
> @@ -115,6 +120,11 @@ int suite_vcn_tests_init();
> int suite_vcn_tests_clean();
>
> /**
> + * Decide if the suite is enabled by default or not.
> + */
> +CU_BOOL suite_vcn_tests_enable(void);
> +
> +/**
> + * Tests in vcn test suite
> + */
> extern CU_TestInfo vcn_tests[];
> @@ -130,6 +140,11 @@ int suite_uvd_enc_tests_init();
> int suite_uvd_enc_tests_clean();
>
> /**
> + * Decide if the suite is enabled by default or not.
> + */
> +CU_BOOL suite_uvd_enc_tests_enable(void);
> +
> +/**
> * Tests in uvd enc test suite
> */
> extern CU_TestInfo uvd_enc_tests[];
> diff --git a/tests/amdgpu/deadlock_tests.c b/tests/amdgpu/deadlock_tests.c
> index e23d903..f5c4552 100644
> --- a/tests/amdgpu/deadlock_tests.c
> +++ b/tests/amdgpu/deadlock_tests.c
> @@ -119,13 +119,7 @@ int suite_deadlock_tests_clean(void)
>
> CU_TestInfo deadlock_tests[] = {
> { "gfx ring block test", amdgpu_deadlock_gfx },
> -
> - /*
> - * BUG: Compute ring stalls and never recovers when the address is
> - * written after the command already submitted
> - */
> - /* { "compute ring block test", amdgpu_deadlock_compute }, */
> -
> + { "compute ring block test", amdgpu_deadlock_compute },
> CU_TEST_INFO_NULL,
> };
>
> diff --git a/tests/amdgpu/uvd_enc_tests.c b/tests/amdgpu/uvd_enc_tests.c
> index bbda131..bed8494 100644
> --- a/tests/amdgpu/uvd_enc_tests.c
> +++ b/tests/amdgpu/uvd_enc_tests.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ static void amdgpu_cs_uvd_enc_session_init(void);
> static void amdgpu_cs_uvd_enc_encode(void);
> static void amdgpu_cs_uvd_enc_destroy(void);
>
> -static bool uvd_enc_support(void);
>
> CU_TestInfo uvd_enc_tests[] = {
> { "UVD ENC create", amdgpu_cs_uvd_enc_create },
> @@ -89,6 +88,27 @@ CU_TestInfo uvd_enc_tests[] = {
> CU_TEST_INFO_NULL,
> };
>
> +CU_BOOL suite_uvd_enc_tests_enable(void)
> +{
> + int r;
> + struct drm_amdgpu_info_hw_ip info;
> +
> + if (amdgpu_device_initialize(drm_amdgpu[0], &major_version,
> + &minor_version, &device_handle))
> + return CU_FALSE;
> +
> + r = amdgpu_query_hw_ip_info(device_handle, AMDGPU_HW_IP_UVD_ENC, 0, &info);
> +
> + if (amdgpu_device_deinitialize(device_handle))
> + return CU_FALSE;
> +
> + if (!info.available_rings)
> + printf("\n\nThe ASIC NOT support UVD ENC, suite disabled.\n");
> +
> + return (r == 0 && (info.available_rings ? CU_TRUE : CU_FALSE));
> +}
> +
> +
> int suite_uvd_enc_tests_init(void)
> {
> int r;
> @@ -100,11 +120,6 @@ int suite_uvd_enc_tests_init(void)
>
> family_id = device_handle->info.family_id;
>
> - if (!uvd_enc_support()) {
> - printf("\n\nThe ASIC NOT support UVD ENC, all sub-tests will pass\n");
> - return CUE_SUCCESS;
> - }
> -
> r = amdgpu_cs_ctx_create(device_handle, &context_handle);
> if (r)
> return CUE_SINIT_FAILED;
> @@ -123,28 +138,18 @@ int suite_uvd_enc_tests_clean(void)
> {
> int r;
>
> - if (!uvd_enc_support()) {
> -
> - r = amdgpu_device_deinitialize(device_handle);
> - if (r)
> - return CUE_SCLEAN_FAILED;
> -
> - return CUE_SUCCESS;
> - } else {
> -
> - r = amdgpu_bo_unmap_and_free(ib_handle, ib_va_handle,
> - ib_mc_address, IB_SIZE);
> - if (r)
> - return CUE_SCLEAN_FAILED;
> + r = amdgpu_bo_unmap_and_free(ib_handle, ib_va_handle,
> + ib_mc_address, IB_SIZE);
> + if (r)
> + return CUE_SCLEAN_FAILED;
>
> - r = amdgpu_cs_ctx_free(context_handle);
> - if (r)
> - return CUE_SCLEAN_FAILED;
> + r = amdgpu_cs_ctx_free(context_handle);
> + if (r)
> + return CUE_SCLEAN_FAILED;
>
> - r = amdgpu_device_deinitialize(device_handle);
> - if (r)
> - return CUE_SCLEAN_FAILED;
> - }
> + r = amdgpu_device_deinitialize(device_handle);
> + if (r)
> + return CUE_SCLEAN_FAILED;
>
> return CUE_SUCCESS;
Seems like this return disappeared somewhere between patching and
pushing the patch.
See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104280
-Emil
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list